Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weimerica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion at author's request. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weimerica

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Far-right portmanteau and neologism that has not had significant coverage in the press or in reliable sources. SPLC only is quoting someone using it and does not have substantial coverage of the term. Google only shows the Daily Caller article and random blogs and far-right websites. On top of the notability concerns, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this article should be excluded under that policy as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a term introduced in a single opinion column published today. Certainly not notable at the present time. Power~enwiki (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - makes sense -- this term is used less than I thought Franzboas (talk) 23:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Franzboas, if that is the case, do you mind if I place the CSD G7 tag on the article (or you can do it yourself). TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - TonyBallioni works for me - thanks Franzboas (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NEO. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.